rb1 (Macklin Inc)
Structured Review

Rb1, supplied by Macklin Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rb1/pmc13149895-47-0-4?v=Macklin+Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Ginsenoside Rb1-engineered nanocomposite hydrogel promotes pressure injury repair through SIRT1-AMPK-mediated ferroptosis inhibition and angiogenesis activation"
Article Title: Ginsenoside Rb1-engineered nanocomposite hydrogel promotes pressure injury repair through SIRT1-AMPK-mediated ferroptosis inhibition and angiogenesis activation
Journal: Journal of Ginseng Research
doi: 10.1016/j.jgr.2026.100987
Figure Legend Snippet: Preparation and characterization of the Rb1@CS@ALG patch. Note: (A) Schematic diagram illustrating the synthesis process of Rb1@CS@ALG-NPs and Rb1@CS@ALG patch; (B) FTIR showing the grafting of CMCS-DA; (C) TEM image of Rb1@CS nanoparticles, scale bar = 150 nm; (D) Particle size distribution of Rb1@CS and Rb1@CS@ALG nanoparticles measured by DLS; (E) Zeta potential of Rb1@CS and Rb1@CS@ALG nanoparticles; (F) TEM image of Rb1@CS@ALG nanoparticles, scale bar = 150 nm; (G) SEM image of the hydrogel microstructure and pore distribution, scale bar = 50 μm; (H) G′ and G″ of the hydrogel measured by rheometry; (I) Swelling ratio of the hydrogel determined by swelling experiments; (J) In vitro degradation rate of the patch assessed by degradation assay; (K) In vitro cumulative release profile of Rb1 analyzed by HPLC; (L) Cell viability of HaCaT cells after treatment with hydrogel extract, measured by the CCK-8 assay. All experiments were repeated three times. ns p > 0.05 indicates no significant difference between groups.
Techniques Used: Zeta Potential Analyzer, In Vitro, Degradation Assay, CCK-8 Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: Mechanistic investigation of the Rb1@CS@ALG patch in repairing HaCaT cell injury. Note: (A) Experimental schematic showing the design of different treatment groups; (B) Cell viability of HaCaT cells assessed by the CCK-8 assay; (C) TUNEL staining to detect apoptosis in HaCaT cells, scale bar = 50 μm; (D) Caspase-3 activity measured using a specific assay kit and cleaved Caspase-3 expression evaluated by Western blot; (E) Levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 in cell culture supernatants quantified by ELISA; (F) Intracellular ROS levels in HaCaT cells; (G) Matrigel invasion assay to assess the migratory ability of HaCaT cells, scale bar = 50 μm. All cellular experiments were conducted in triplicate. ∗ indicates comparison between two groups; ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: CCK-8 Assay, TUNEL Assay, Staining, Activity Assay, Expressing, Western Blot, Cell Culture, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Invasion Assay, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: Molecular mechanism by which the Rb1@CS@ALG patch inhibits ferroptosis via the SIRT1-AMPK signaling pathway. Note: (A) Western blot analysis of GPX4, SLC7A11, and ACSL4 protein expression in HaCaT cells; (B) Intracellular ROS levels detected using the DCFH-DA fluorescent probe; (C) MDA levels in HaCaT cells measured using an MDA detection kit; (D) GSH levels in HaCaT cells measured using a GSH detection kit; (E) Intracellular ATP content measured with an ATP assay kit; (F) Intracellular Fe 2+ concentration quantified using a colorimetric iron assay kit; (G) Western blot analysis of SIRT1, p-AMPK, and p-ACC protein expression in HaCaT cells; (H) Cell viability evaluated by CCK-8 assay. All cellular experiments were conducted in triplicate. ∗ indicates comparison between two groups; ns p > 0.05, ∗ p < 0.05, ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗ p < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Expressing, ATP Assay, Concentration Assay, Iron Assay, CCK-8 Assay, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: In vivo evaluation of the Rb1@CS@ALG patch in promoting regeneration of PI wounds. Note: (A) Schematic diagram of the animal experimental design outlining the treatment protocols for each group; (B) Photographic documentation of wound healing progression in SD rats; (C) Wound area reduction rate quantified by image analysis software; (D) H&E staining of wound tissues to assess histopathological changes, bar = 50 μm and 500 μm; (E) Masson's trichrome staining to evaluate collagen deposition in wound tissues, bar = 50 μm; (F) IHC staining of CD31 to assess neovascularization, bar = 50 μm; (G) Immunofluorescence staining of K14 to examine epithelial regeneration, bar = 50 μm; (H) IHC staining of α-SMA to evaluate fibroblast activation, bar = 50 μm; (I) Western blot analysis of Col I, Col III, and TGF-β protein expression in wound tissues. Each group contained six SD rats. ∗ indicates comparison between two groups; ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: In Vivo, Software, Staining, Immunohistochemistry, Immunofluorescence, Activation Assay, Western Blot, Expressing, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: In vivo evaluation of the anti-inflammatory and anti-ferroptotic effects of the Rb1@CS@ALG patch. Note: (A) IHC staining to assess the distribution of TNF-α and IL-10 in wound tissues, bar = 25 μm; (B) Western blot analysis of GPX4 and SLC7A11 protein expression in wound tissues; (C) Colorimetric assay for Fe 2+ concentration in wound tissues; (D) ELISA detection of serum levels of TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β; (E-F) Colorimetric quantification of MDA and GSH levels in wound tissues; (G) Fluorescent probe assay to measure ROS levels in wound tissues. Each group included six SD rats. ∗ indicates comparison between two groups; ∗∗ p < 0.01, ∗∗∗∗ p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: In Vivo, Immunohistochemistry, Western Blot, Expressing, Colorimetric Assay, Concentration Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Comparison
Figure Legend Snippet: RNA-seq of the therapeutic effects of the Rb1@CS@ALG patch on PI. Note: (A) Volcano plot showing DEGs (red: upregulated genes; green: downregulated genes); (B) GO and KEGG pathway enrichment presented as bubble plots illustrating significantly enriched signaling pathways; (C-E) Expression profiles of ferroptosis-related genes in the transcriptome; (F-I) Expression profiles of immune-related genes in the transcriptome. Each group included three rats.
Techniques Used: RNA Sequencing, Protein-Protein interactions, Expressing



